Architecture

Agents borrow blast radius. That's the problem.

An AI agent using a user's session is not automation. It is privilege amplification with a friendly interface.

An AI agent using a user's session is not automation. It is privilege amplification with a friendly interface.

Agentic systems need first-class identity, scoped credentials, revocation, and audit trails before they touch anything operational.

This is not theoretical for me. In payment-adjacent systems, the dangerous failure is rarely one bad request — it is a tool with too much authority doing a sequence of plausible actions. The current security conversation is converging from several directions at once: agent credentials, credential brokers, API keys that do not revoke instantly, sandbox designs with observability gaps.

That is the architecture line I would draw: an agent should never borrow a human's blast radius just to get work done.

The agent stack will mature when identity boundaries become boring infrastructure, not an afterthought.

Теги
ai-agentsagent-securityidentity-access-managementregulated-systems

Связанные проекты

Инфраструктура подтверждений для AI-действий

Approva

Подтверждение человеком для рискованных действий AI-агентов — passkey-идентификация, ограниченные capabilities, проверяемый audit trail. Human-in-the-loop как инфраструктура.

Подписка

Еженедельный разбор сигналов прямо в почту.

Один email в неделю. Никакого спама. Отписка одним кликом.