Authority topics

AI engineering

The engineering advantage comes from making probabilistic components legible, testable, and bounded inside deterministic systems.

Practical analysis of coding agents, agent infrastructure, context and retrieval, model/tool boundaries, verification, and the engineering systems around model output.

Core writing

Further writing

Recent analysis

NoteSeptember 14, 2026

AI Is Turning Hidden Assumptions Into System Contracts

Agent execution is getting cheap enough that requirements, acceptance criteria, autonomy boundaries, state and architecture economics can no longer remain implicit. This Weekly Read shows how to turn those hidden assumptions into inspectable system contracts using requirement recovery, executable acceptance, evidence-based handoffs, durable state and lifecycle cost models.

Weekly Read
15 min
NoteAugust 31, 2026

Agent Interfaces Are Becoming Control Planes

Agent interfaces are becoming control planes: context, MCP/WebMCP actions, enterprise identity, automated feedback loops and hardware drivers now carry operational authority. This Weekly Read shows where to move provenance, delegation, retry budgets, revocation and physical interlocks before agent capability outruns the boundaries around it.

Weekly Read
14 min
NoteAugust 24, 2026

The Model Stopped Being the Interesting Variable

Week of August 17, 2026. Mistral tripled accuracy on financial filings — 26.7% to 86% — by changing how the model searches, not which model searches. Two different models from two different labs got the same roughly threefold lift from the same harness. That pattern ran through the week: authorisation splitting into four separate questions, a token optimisation that cut tokens and raised total cost by half, throughput outgrowing the review capacity around it, and execution moving into shared team channels. The leverage kept turning out to sit outside the model. A scan-layer TL;DR, five themes each with an operator move, one taken deep, three counter-signals, and what to track.

Weekly Read
14 min
NoteAugust 10, 2026

Capability Outran Confirmation

Week of August 3, 2026. Frontier models generated 6,080 security patches and roughly a quarter of them worked — while a plausible-but-wrong hint in the prompt cut the success rate to one in six, and the agents followed the hint over their own evidence. The same gap opened everywhere: peak capability diverging from production reliability, agents that cannot verify themselves, operational data capping what any model can automate, and portable artifacts carrying no portable trust. Production got cheap. Confirming what was produced did not. A scan-layer TL;DR, five themes each with an operator move, one taken deep, three counter-signals, and what to track.

Weekly Read
14 min
NoteJuly 13, 2026

No Layer Was Reliable by Default

Week of July 6, 2026. The model regressed on its tools, the benchmark used to rank it turned out to be broken, and 'smarter' stopped meaning 'more reliable.' So 'one best model' quietly stopped being an architecture: a mature system now holds a portfolio, routes by verified task-fit, and checks confidence outside the model at every layer. A scan-layer TL;DR, five themes each with an operator move, one taken deep, three counter-signals, and what to track.

Weekly Read
16 min
NoteJune 15, 2026

The System Around the Model Started to Matter More Than the Model

Week of June 8, 2026. Five themes where the value kept moving off the model and into the system around it — compute contracts, observable governance, agent runtimes, and the operating model that has to absorb the output. Plus three counter-signals worth holding in tension.

Weekly Read
8 min
NoteJune 8, 2026

Output Got Cheap, Absorption Got Expensive

Week of June 1, 2026. The same pattern repeated across AI cost, enterprise agents, security, coding, and stablecoins: generation got cheap and the constraint moved to absorption. A scan-layer TL;DR, five themes each with an operator move, one theme taken deep, three counter-signals, and what to track.

Weekly Read
14 min
NoteJune 1, 2026

Control Planes Beat Autonomy, Tokens Stop Meaning Progress

Week of May 25, 2026. Five themes shaping how AI agents, AI coding, and AI economics are actually landing in serious engineering organizations — plus three counter-signals worth holding in tension.

Weekly Read
7 min

Short pieces

PostAugust 20, 2026

One task in my workflow can be researched in ChatGPT, implemented by Codex, challenged by Claude, and updated through MCP.

Most project tools still assume every participant is human, which leaves someone acting as the relay between chats, repositories, decisions and the board.

Building
1 min
PostAugust 11, 2026

A generated patch is a hypothesis until someone re-runs the exploit.

Across 6,080 AI-generated patches only 26% were clean — and a plausible-but-wrong fix direction in the prompt cut success from two-thirds to one in six, with agents overriding their own contrary evidence.

AI engineering
1 min
PostAugust 10, 2026

We keep securing the model and trusting the scaffolding around it.

Every control we put on an agent lives in the harness — so once the agent can edit its own prompts, tools and memory, a harness change is a privileged production change.

AI engineering
1 min
PostAugust 6, 2026

Four agents cleared the backlog because none was allowed to be the hero.

Astro's issue factory separated reproduction, diagnosis, verification and implementation — the improvement came from forbidding self-verification, not from adding agents.

AI engineering
1 min
PostJuly 28, 2026

AI can generate five implementations of the same rule before anyone notices the rule has split.

When generation gets cheap, duplicated business meaning gets expensive — the source of truth has to become harder to copy, not easier.

AI engineering
1 min
PostJuly 21, 2026

Your AI product is already interviewing every user — most teams throw the transcript away.

An AI interaction states intent directly instead of leaving it to be inferred from clicks, which makes conversation logs a governed product-research surface rather than discarded exhaust.

AI governance
1 min
PostJuly 17, 2026

The strongest privacy policy may be a system that never sends the data.

On-device inference turns privacy into a property of architecture rather than paperwork — the strongest privacy policy is a system that never sends the data.

AI governance
1 min
PostJuly 15, 2026

In agentic systems, safe defaults matter more than good warnings — the agent may never read the warning.

As agents run more workflows, security has to live in default-off execution paths, because the agent may never read the warning a human would have caught.

AI security
1 min
PostJuly 14, 2026

A good agent skill is not a clever prompt — it is organizational procedure made executable.

A reusable agent skill is organizational procedure made executable — versioned, reviewed, and owned — which is how know-how moves from tribal to institutional.

AI engineering
1 min
PostJuly 10, 2026

The dangerous agent failure is not always a bad answer. Sometimes it is public input reaching private context.

GitLost showed a crafted public GitHub issue steering an agent with cross-repo read access into posting a private README as a public comment — no stolen credentials, just a context-separation failure. The agent runs on a service-account permission model, not a user one, so no patch closes it; the fix is architectural. If public text can steer private access, the permission model is already broken.

AI Security
1 min
PostJuly 8, 2026

A model can get smarter and still make your system less reliable. That is what weak tool contracts do.

The newest Claude models regressed on one edit tool — inventing fields that did not match the schema, failing ~20% of the time in a real agentic session. Smarter model, worse tool behavior, only visible in a long history. The fix is not a better prompt; it is stricter schemas and runtimes that fail loudly. The tool contract is part of the product's intelligence.

AI Engineering
1 min
PostJuly 7, 2026

AI is getting good at reviewing code. That is exactly why the human's job in review has to move up.

An AI reviewer is good at the mechanical pass — but it misses the change that fits the diff and breaks the architecture. The reviewer's value moves up the abstraction stack, to the judgment and accountability the model structurally cannot supply. The mechanical reviewer can be automated; the one who owns the consequence cannot.

AI Engineering
1 min

Built from this thinking